<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Writing Addresses</title>
	<atom:link href="http://data.grammarbook.com/blog/numbers/how-do-i-write-addresses/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://data.grammarbook.com/blog/numbers/how-do-i-write-addresses/</link>
	<description>The #1 Grammar &#38; Punctuation Resource on the Internet!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:14:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jane</title>
		<link>http://data.grammarbook.com/blog/numbers/how-do-i-write-addresses/#comment-7909</link>
		<dc:creator>Jane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 02:10:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://data.grammarbook.com/blog/?p=19#comment-7909</guid>
		<description>The plural of suite is suites. It should be capitalized if it is part of a formal address.
Example: 100 Wilshire Boulevard, Suites 100 and 101.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The plural of suite is suites. It should be capitalized if it is part of a formal address.<br />
Example: 100 Wilshire Boulevard, Suites 100 and 101.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sabrina</title>
		<link>http://data.grammarbook.com/blog/numbers/how-do-i-write-addresses/#comment-7835</link>
		<dc:creator>sabrina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 17:18:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://data.grammarbook.com/blog/?p=19#comment-7835</guid>
		<description>What is the correct way to write &quot;suite&quot; when there are 2 suite numbers?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is the correct way to write &#8220;suite&#8221; when there are 2 suite numbers?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jane</title>
		<link>http://data.grammarbook.com/blog/numbers/how-do-i-write-addresses/#comment-6793</link>
		<dc:creator>Jane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2011 21:43:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://data.grammarbook.com/blog/?p=19#comment-6793</guid>
		<description>Perhaps they were referring to the introduction of the zip code for United States mail. Ziip codes were introduced in 1967 and were still being promoted as &quot;new&quot; in the1970s. (Please note that there is no appostrophe in 1970s.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps they were referring to the introduction of the zip code for United States mail. Ziip codes were introduced in 1967 and were still being promoted as &#8220;new&#8221; in the1970s. (Please note that there is no appostrophe in 1970s.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cori</title>
		<link>http://data.grammarbook.com/blog/numbers/how-do-i-write-addresses/#comment-6622</link>
		<dc:creator>Cori</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2011 19:40:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://data.grammarbook.com/blog/?p=19#comment-6622</guid>
		<description>I learned how to write an envelope in fourth grade.... they stated that this is the new way to address an envelope.

By the way, that was in the late 1970&#039;s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I learned how to write an envelope in fourth grade&#8230;. they stated that this is the new way to address an envelope.</p>
<p>By the way, that was in the late 1970&#8242;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jane</title>
		<link>http://data.grammarbook.com/blog/numbers/how-do-i-write-addresses/#comment-4185</link>
		<dc:creator>Jane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jul 2010 04:39:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://data.grammarbook.com/blog/?p=19#comment-4185</guid>
		<description>This is from the USPS site, http://pe.usps.com/text/pub28/pub28c2_016.htm: Numeric street names, for example, 7TH ST or SEVENTH ST, should be output on the mailpiece exactly as they appear in the ZIP+4 file. Spell out numeric street names only when there are duplicate street names within a postal delivery area and the only distinguishing factor is that the one you matched is spelled out.

Most of us don&#039;t have the ZIP+4 file; therefore I recommend following the advice given in the second sentence, i.e., generally use numerals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is from the USPS site, <a href="http://pe.usps.com/text/pub28/pub28c2_016.htm" rel="nofollow">http://pe.usps.com/text/pub28/pub28c2_016.htm</a>: Numeric street names, for example, 7TH ST or SEVENTH ST, should be output on the mailpiece exactly as they appear in the ZIP+4 file. Spell out numeric street names only when there are duplicate street names within a postal delivery area and the only distinguishing factor is that the one you matched is spelled out.</p>
<p>Most of us don&#8217;t have the ZIP+4 file; therefore I recommend following the advice given in the second sentence, i.e., generally use numerals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark M</title>
		<link>http://data.grammarbook.com/blog/numbers/how-do-i-write-addresses/#comment-4184</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 17:01:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://data.grammarbook.com/blog/?p=19#comment-4184</guid>
		<description>What if it&#039;s a single-digit house/building number?  For example:
Two Penn Center, Suite 1313

Would I write 2 PENN CENTER STE 1313 or TWO PENN CENTER STE 1313?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What if it&#8217;s a single-digit house/building number?  For example:<br />
Two Penn Center, Suite 1313</p>
<p>Would I write 2 PENN CENTER STE 1313 or TWO PENN CENTER STE 1313?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jane</title>
		<link>http://data.grammarbook.com/blog/numbers/how-do-i-write-addresses/#comment-1115</link>
		<dc:creator>Jane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 21:44:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://data.grammarbook.com/blog/?p=19#comment-1115</guid>
		<description>True!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Misty</title>
		<link>http://data.grammarbook.com/blog/numbers/how-do-i-write-addresses/#comment-1113</link>
		<dc:creator>Misty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 18:21:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://data.grammarbook.com/blog/?p=19#comment-1113</guid>
		<description>The Associated Press Stylebook dictates the lack of a comma before the conjunction in a series. Most newspapers and journalistic writers adhere to the AP principals/rules of writing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Associated Press Stylebook dictates the lack of a comma before the conjunction in a series. Most newspapers and journalistic writers adhere to the AP principals/rules of writing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mitch Lopate</title>
		<link>http://data.grammarbook.com/blog/numbers/how-do-i-write-addresses/#comment-91</link>
		<dc:creator>Mitch Lopate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 17:00:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://data.grammarbook.com/blog/?p=19#comment-91</guid>
		<description>This appears to have been answered in the book Eats, Shoots &amp; Leaves by British author Lynne Truss.
As I recall, Lynne explained this as the &quot;Oxford comma,&quot; and I discuss this each semester in my college composition class. So it seems to have been a true &quot;English&quot; issue--and I would rather have the extra comma.

I use the example of the 60s folk group Peter, Paul and Mary--and I prefer to have the comma after Paul Stookey&#039;s name. The reason for that, I explain, is that if Paul could not make a performance for some reason, would that exclude Mary too?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This appears to have been answered in the book Eats, Shoots &amp; Leaves by British author Lynne Truss.<br />
As I recall, Lynne explained this as the &#8220;Oxford comma,&#8221; and I discuss this each semester in my college composition class. So it seems to have been a true &#8220;English&#8221; issue&#8211;and I would rather have the extra comma.</p>
<p>I use the example of the 60s folk group Peter, Paul and Mary&#8211;and I prefer to have the comma after Paul Stookey&#8217;s name. The reason for that, I explain, is that if Paul could not make a performance for some reason, would that exclude Mary too?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jane</title>
		<link>http://data.grammarbook.com/blog/numbers/how-do-i-write-addresses/#comment-90</link>
		<dc:creator>Jane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Feb 2007 17:19:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://data.grammarbook.com/blog/?p=19#comment-90</guid>
		<description>Ernestine, you don&#039;t need a comma after &quot;and.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ernestine, you don&#8217;t need a comma after &#8220;and.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

