<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Subjunctive Mode</title>
	<atom:link href="http://data.grammarbook.com/blog/uncategorized/subjunctive-mode-and-some-confusing-words/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://data.grammarbook.com/blog/effective-writing/subjunctive-mode-and-some-confusing-words/</link>
	<description>The #1 Grammar &#38; Punctuation Resource on the Internet!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:14:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jane</title>
		<link>http://data.grammarbook.com/blog/effective-writing/subjunctive-mode-and-some-confusing-words/#comment-10028</link>
		<dc:creator>Jane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2012 00:03:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://data.grammarbook.com/blog/?p=74#comment-10028</guid>
		<description>Thank you for the compliment!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for the compliment!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jane</title>
		<link>http://data.grammarbook.com/blog/effective-writing/subjunctive-mode-and-some-confusing-words/#comment-10056</link>
		<dc:creator>Jane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 22:11:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://data.grammarbook.com/blog/?p=74#comment-10056</guid>
		<description>Yes, the usage of &quot;were&quot; does apply to an object as well as a person.
Example: If the firecracker were to explode, it would hurt my ears.
 
If only one option were available, which would you prefer?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, the usage of &#8220;were&#8221; does apply to an object as well as a person.<br />
Example: If the firecracker were to explode, it would hurt my ears.</p>
<p>If only one option were available, which would you prefer?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Silvia German</title>
		<link>http://data.grammarbook.com/blog/effective-writing/subjunctive-mode-and-some-confusing-words/#comment-9775</link>
		<dc:creator>Silvia German</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 18:35:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://data.grammarbook.com/blog/?p=74#comment-9775</guid>
		<description>Dear Jane,
All the examples above of the subjunctive mode refer to a person or persons. Does usage of &quot;were&quot; in a hypothetical sentence also apply to objects and situations?
Example:
If only one option were available which would you prefer? 
Or should it be: &quot;If only one option was available&quot;
Thanks for your help
Silvia</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Jane,<br />
All the examples above of the subjunctive mode refer to a person or persons. Does usage of &#8220;were&#8221; in a hypothetical sentence also apply to objects and situations?<br />
Example:<br />
If only one option were available which would you prefer?<br />
Or should it be: &#8220;If only one option was available&#8221;<br />
Thanks for your help<br />
Silvia</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Nieves</title>
		<link>http://data.grammarbook.com/blog/effective-writing/subjunctive-mode-and-some-confusing-words/#comment-9017</link>
		<dc:creator>George Nieves</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2011 00:58:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://data.grammarbook.com/blog/?p=74#comment-9017</guid>
		<description>Your lessons are great and so easy to follow</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your lessons are great and so easy to follow</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jane</title>
		<link>http://data.grammarbook.com/blog/effective-writing/subjunctive-mode-and-some-confusing-words/#comment-5724</link>
		<dc:creator>Jane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2011 12:03:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://data.grammarbook.com/blog/?p=74#comment-5724</guid>
		<description>You pose a very interesting question.  The article on the following website might shed some light on the matter:

http://www.ceafinney.com/subjunctive/excerpts.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You pose a very interesting question.  The article on the following website might shed some light on the matter:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ceafinney.com/subjunctive/excerpts.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.ceafinney.com/subjunctive/excerpts.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kenneth Howe Jones, MArch</title>
		<link>http://data.grammarbook.com/blog/effective-writing/subjunctive-mode-and-some-confusing-words/#comment-5069</link>
		<dc:creator>Kenneth Howe Jones, MArch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Apr 2011 15:15:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://data.grammarbook.com/blog/?p=74#comment-5069</guid>
		<description>What I&#039;d like to know is the reasoning behind the use of the plural &quot;I were&quot; instead of the singular &quot;I was&quot;?  Seems very arbitrary and even a bit pompous doesn&#039;t it?   Is it perhaps from a British preference (or archaic-historic usage)?  Or perhaps to just keep the SM rule as simple as possible?   As a student of semantics and linguistics over the last fifty years or so,  the logic behind this choice has always managed to elude me.  It still strikes me as just another of those committee decisions without any real basis.  Could you perhaps shed some light on the matter?   Thoughts?  
Thanks.  KHJ</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I&#8217;d like to know is the reasoning behind the use of the plural &#8220;I were&#8221; instead of the singular &#8220;I was&#8221;?  Seems very arbitrary and even a bit pompous doesn&#8217;t it?   Is it perhaps from a British preference (or archaic-historic usage)?  Or perhaps to just keep the SM rule as simple as possible?   As a student of semantics and linguistics over the last fifty years or so,  the logic behind this choice has always managed to elude me.  It still strikes me as just another of those committee decisions without any real basis.  Could you perhaps shed some light on the matter?   Thoughts?<br />
Thanks.  KHJ</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jane</title>
		<link>http://data.grammarbook.com/blog/effective-writing/subjunctive-mode-and-some-confusing-words/#comment-4966</link>
		<dc:creator>Jane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2011 20:19:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://data.grammarbook.com/blog/?p=74#comment-4966</guid>
		<description>You are correct about the subjunctive nature of the sentence.  In the case of your sentence, the use of &quot;his desire&quot; can cause the verb &quot;bear&quot; to have a subjunctive mood because a wish is being expressed.  The subjunctive mood pairs singular subjects with what we usually think of as plural verbs.  The subjective mood is losing ground in spoken English but should still be used in formal speech and writing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are correct about the subjunctive nature of the sentence.  In the case of your sentence, the use of &#8220;his desire&#8221; can cause the verb &#8220;bear&#8221; to have a subjunctive mood because a wish is being expressed.  The subjunctive mood pairs singular subjects with what we usually think of as plural verbs.  The subjective mood is losing ground in spoken English but should still be used in formal speech and writing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://data.grammarbook.com/blog/effective-writing/subjunctive-mode-and-some-confusing-words/#comment-4753</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jan 2011 16:27:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://data.grammarbook.com/blog/?p=74#comment-4753</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s something for which I require assurance. I am constantly running afoul of the spelling and grammar checker in Microsoft Word. Most recently, I typed this sentence [truncated here]: &quot;... so that she might become pregnant, in keeping with his desire that she bear his child.&quot; Microsoft is not happy with my choice of &#039;bear&#039; and suggests &#039;bears.&#039; I know damned well that Microsoft is wrong! My question is this: is it the subjunctive nature of the sentence which would make &#039;bear&#039; correct, or is there some other grammatical rule operating here?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s something for which I require assurance. I am constantly running afoul of the spelling and grammar checker in Microsoft Word. Most recently, I typed this sentence [truncated here]: &#8220;&#8230; so that she might become pregnant, in keeping with his desire that she bear his child.&#8221; Microsoft is not happy with my choice of &#8216;bear&#8217; and suggests &#8216;bears.&#8217; I know damned well that Microsoft is wrong! My question is this: is it the subjunctive nature of the sentence which would make &#8216;bear&#8217; correct, or is there some other grammatical rule operating here?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jane</title>
		<link>http://data.grammarbook.com/blog/effective-writing/subjunctive-mode-and-some-confusing-words/#comment-4504</link>
		<dc:creator>Jane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Oct 2010 02:44:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://data.grammarbook.com/blog/?p=74#comment-4504</guid>
		<description>&quot;I wish I were as intelligent as you.&quot;
&quot;He wishes he were the best student...&quot;
You are correct in using the subjunctive mood.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I wish I were as intelligent as you.&#8221;<br />
&#8220;He wishes he were the best student&#8230;&#8221;<br />
You are correct in using the subjunctive mood.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carmen</title>
		<link>http://data.grammarbook.com/blog/effective-writing/subjunctive-mode-and-some-confusing-words/#comment-4502</link>
		<dc:creator>Carmen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Oct 2010 02:08:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://data.grammarbook.com/blog/?p=74#comment-4502</guid>
		<description>This part of grammar was excelent, It&#039;s just I wanted to know. But  It rested me a little doubt:. Subjunctive with verb to be, the first person (I) and third person (he/she) is always WERE? Example: I wish I were so intelligent like you. Or  He wishes he were the best student in his class this year. Are these sentences ok? please I wish you corrected my mistakes.
Thanks a lot.
I neither know if the website is correct. Excuse me.
Regards from....Carnen
  e- mail   lovelyipaz@live.cl</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This part of grammar was excelent, It&#8217;s just I wanted to know. But  It rested me a little doubt:. Subjunctive with verb to be, the first person (I) and third person (he/she) is always WERE? Example: I wish I were so intelligent like you. Or  He wishes he were the best student in his class this year. Are these sentences ok? please I wish you corrected my mistakes.<br />
Thanks a lot.<br />
I neither know if the website is correct. Excuse me.<br />
Regards from&#8230;.Carnen<br />
  e- mail   <a href="mailto:lovelyipaz@live.cl">lovelyipaz@live.cl</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

