<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apostrophes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://data.grammarbook.com/blog/valuable-links/the-most-common-punctuation-error-of-all/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://data.grammarbook.com/blog/valuable-links/the-most-common-punctuation-error-of-all/</link>
	<description>The #1 Grammar &#38; Punctuation Resource on the Internet!</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 02:07:06 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jane</title>
		<link>http://data.grammarbook.com/blog/valuable-links/the-most-common-punctuation-error-of-all/comment-page-1/#comment-63</link>
		<dc:creator>Jane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 19:14:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://data.grammarbook.com/blog/?p=12#comment-63</guid>
		<description>"A monster's got to do..." is correct. The apostrophe is for the contraction "A monster has got to do..."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;A monster&#8217;s got to do&#8230;&#8221; is correct. The apostrophe is for the contraction &#8220;A monster has got to do&#8230;&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Shaw</title>
		<link>http://data.grammarbook.com/blog/valuable-links/the-most-common-punctuation-error-of-all/comment-page-1/#comment-64</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Shaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 19:08:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://data.grammarbook.com/blog/?p=12#comment-64</guid>
		<description>I found this example in my daughter's (British) reading book this evening: "A monster's got to do what a monster's got to do!" I suppose this is correct but somehow it strikes me as odd. What do you think?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found this example in my daughter&#8217;s (British) reading book this evening: &#8220;A monster&#8217;s got to do what a monster&#8217;s got to do!&#8221; I suppose this is correct but somehow it strikes me as odd. What do you think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jane</title>
		<link>http://data.grammarbook.com/blog/valuable-links/the-most-common-punctuation-error-of-all/comment-page-1/#comment-65</link>
		<dc:creator>Jane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 22:57:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://data.grammarbook.com/blog/?p=12#comment-65</guid>
		<description>Carol,
This is an option that some of us prefer.  This note is from my site:
http://www.grammarbook.com/punctuation/apostro.asp Rule 2
NOTE: Although names ending in s or an s sound are not required to have the second s added in possessive form, it is preferred.
Mr. Jones's golf clubs
Texas's weather
Ms. Straus's daughter
Jose Sanchez's artwork
Dr. Hastings's appointment (name is Hastings)
Mrs. Lees's books (name is Lees)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Carol,<br />
This is an option that some of us prefer.  This note is from my site:<br />
<a href="http://www.grammarbook.com/punctuation/apostro.asp" rel="nofollow">http://www.grammarbook.com/punctuation/apostro.asp</a> Rule 2<br />
NOTE: Although names ending in s or an s sound are not required to have the second s added in possessive form, it is preferred.<br />
Mr. Jones&#8217;s golf clubs<br />
Texas&#8217;s weather<br />
Ms. Straus&#8217;s daughter<br />
Jose Sanchez&#8217;s artwork<br />
Dr. Hastings&#8217;s appointment (name is Hastings)<br />
Mrs. Lees&#8217;s books (name is Lees)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carol</title>
		<link>http://data.grammarbook.com/blog/valuable-links/the-most-common-punctuation-error-of-all/comment-page-1/#comment-66</link>
		<dc:creator>Carol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 22:51:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://data.grammarbook.com/blog/?p=12#comment-66</guid>
		<description>I just finished reading a novel in which an "apostrophe S" was added to show possession in names already ending in S, i.e., Chris's. Is this a new rule or poor proofreading?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just finished reading a novel in which an &#8220;apostrophe S&#8221; was added to show possession in names already ending in S, i.e., Chris&#8217;s. Is this a new rule or poor proofreading?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jane</title>
		<link>http://data.grammarbook.com/blog/valuable-links/the-most-common-punctuation-error-of-all/comment-page-1/#comment-67</link>
		<dc:creator>Jane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 14:15:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://data.grammarbook.com/blog/?p=12#comment-67</guid>
		<description>Since the plural of "deer" is still "deer," you can't add the "s" first for the plural possessive. So both the singular possessive and plural possessive of "deer" is "deer's."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since the plural of &#8220;deer&#8221; is still &#8220;deer,&#8221; you can&#8217;t add the &#8220;s&#8221; first for the plural possessive. So both the singular possessive and plural possessive of &#8220;deer&#8221; is &#8220;deer&#8217;s.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kayla</title>
		<link>http://data.grammarbook.com/blog/valuable-links/the-most-common-punctuation-error-of-all/comment-page-1/#comment-68</link>
		<dc:creator>Kayla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 11:22:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://data.grammarbook.com/blog/?p=12#comment-68</guid>
		<description>What should the plural possessive be for deer? This was my answer:
            Singular Possessive            Plural Possessive
deer              deer's                               deers'

I got the Plural Possessive answer wrong. What did I miss?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What should the plural possessive be for deer? This was my answer:<br />
            Singular Possessive            Plural Possessive<br />
deer              deer&#8217;s                               deers&#8217;</p>
<p>I got the Plural Possessive answer wrong. What did I miss?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jane</title>
		<link>http://data.grammarbook.com/blog/valuable-links/the-most-common-punctuation-error-of-all/comment-page-1/#comment-62</link>
		<dc:creator>Jane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 17:29:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://data.grammarbook.com/blog/?p=12#comment-62</guid>
		<description>The "s" on all the words you ask about is optional. American English usage tends to leave off the "s" while British usage tends to add it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8220;s&#8221; on all the words you ask about is optional. American English usage tends to leave off the &#8220;s&#8221; while British usage tends to add it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sharon</title>
		<link>http://data.grammarbook.com/blog/valuable-links/the-most-common-punctuation-error-of-all/comment-page-1/#comment-61</link>
		<dc:creator>Sharon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 02:06:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://data.grammarbook.com/blog/?p=12#comment-61</guid>
		<description>Are upwards, downwards, towards, etc., correct, or should it be upward, downward, toward, etc.?

Thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are upwards, downwards, towards, etc., correct, or should it be upward, downward, toward, etc.?</p>
<p>Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jane</title>
		<link>http://data.grammarbook.com/blog/valuable-links/the-most-common-punctuation-error-of-all/comment-page-1/#comment-60</link>
		<dc:creator>Jane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 22:40:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://data.grammarbook.com/blog/?p=12#comment-60</guid>
		<description>Todd, there are two answers. If you think of "branch managers" as part of the title, you would not need an apostrophe. If you think of "branch managers" as a description of the meeting, then you would write, "branch managers' meeting."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Todd, there are two answers. If you think of &#8220;branch managers&#8221; as part of the title, you would not need an apostrophe. If you think of &#8220;branch managers&#8221; as a description of the meeting, then you would write, &#8220;branch managers&#8217; meeting.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd</title>
		<link>http://data.grammarbook.com/blog/valuable-links/the-most-common-punctuation-error-of-all/comment-page-1/#comment-59</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 22:10:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://data.grammarbook.com/blog/?p=12#comment-59</guid>
		<description>What is the actual and correct use of an apostrophe for the following statement:

The branch managers meeting will be held on Thursday?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is the actual and correct use of an apostrophe for the following statement:</p>
<p>The branch managers meeting will be held on Thursday?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
