Are We Hyphenating Well?



The proper use of good and well in writing is a common grammatical topic; we last addressed it in September 2017. For many, the distinction can be uncertain.

An equally slippery subject is whether to hyphenate well when it helps describe a noun. For example, do we write a well-dressed man or a well dressed man?

Because well here is an adverb that modifies dressed, some might say not to punctuate the compound description; this would align with the guideline that omits punctuation from adverbial modifiers ending in -ly: a thoroughly informed spokesperson. Some might also believe that only compounded adjectives would be hyphenated: bluish-green eyes.

As a general rule, a compound adjective can include an adverb. The compound is often hyphenated before a noun but not after a noun (a well-dressed man, the man is well dressed). Well also would not be hyphenated when compounded with other adverbial modifiers, such as very (a very well dressed man).

At the same time, further investigation reveals that not all style authorities agree on this subject. The Associated Press Stylebook advises us to hyphenate well in a compound modifier both when it precedes a noun and when the compound follows the verb to be: a well-dressed man, the man is well-dressed.

AP’s rationale is that retaining the hyphen in compound modifiers after the noun helps avoid confusion. For example, if the hyphen is omitted in a statement such as he is a little known man, the reader might interpret it as meaning he is a known man who is little. Adding the hyphen clarifies: little-known man tells us he is one few people know. Writing the man is well-dressed remains consistent with AP’s chosen style.

The Chicago Manual of Style, on the other hand, doesn’t concur with this stance. Its editors find hyphenation unnecessary when a compound modifier with well follows a noun, including compounds that might be hyphenated in dictionaries. It would therefore encourage us to write the man is well dressed.

Other style hawks assert that certain compounds with well should retain their hyphens in all positions because they are single concepts or standard expressions. These individuals would cite examples such as well-appointed, well-founded, well-connected, and well-intentioned; to them, each compound’s meaning differs from its unmodified adjective (appointed, founded, connected, intentioned), making well vital to clarity.

By this reasoning, these compound concepts or expressions would retain their hyphen even when well is modified by another adverb such as very: a very well-appointed man.

With all this considered, we still might ask ourselves: When do we truly need to hyphenate? The experts don’t agree and even seemingly reliable guidelines can have exceptions. The answer is that rules of hyphenation for well are not engraved in stone.

As with anything else in our writing, clarity is king. If a hyphen makes our meanings clearer, we keep it; otherwise, we leave it out as nonessential. Consistency matters as well. As long as we choose a style and stick to it, our usage will help sustain our writing rather than distract from it.

 

Pop Quiz

Choose the correct treatment according to the general rule of hyphenating well described in the article.

1) With her connections, she has become a (very well-known / very well known) businessperson in the community.

2) I find him (well versed / well-versed) in Shakespearean drama.

3) She is always (well prepared / well-prepared) for her meetings.

4) Their (well-behaved / well behaved) children are good company whenever they visit.

 

Pop Quiz Answers

1) With her connections, she has become a (very well-known / very well known) businessperson in the community.

2) I find him (well versed / well-versed) in Shakespearean drama.

3) She always comes (well prepared / well-prepared) for her meetings.

4) Their (well-behaved / well behaved) children are good company whenever they visit.

Posted on Tuesday, April 3, 2018, at 11:00 pm

If you wish to respond to another reader's question or comment, please click its corresponding "REPLY" button. If the article or the existing discussions do not address a thought or question you have on the subject, please use the "Comment" box at the bottom of this page.

2 Comments on Are We Hyphenating Well?

2 responses to “Are We Hyphenating Well?”

  1. Janice H. says:

    The following sentence is inherently ambiguous: He is a wild animal trainer. Clarifications: “He is an animal trainer who is wild.” “He is a trainer of wild animals.” I think there is no way to clarify with punctuation the original sentence. What would you say?

    • To the careful reader, He is a wild animal trainer does mean that “He is an animal trainer who is wild.”

      On the other hand, He is a wild-animal trainer clearly means “He is a trainer of wild animals.”

      That is a good example of the importance of proper hyphen placement.

Leave a Comment or Question:

Please ensure that your question or comment relates to the topic of the blog post. Unrelated comments may be deleted. If necessary, use the "Search" box on the right side of the page to find a post closely related to your question or comment.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *