Grammar That’s what that means? |
The Blue Book of Grammar and Punctuation

That’s what that means?

I know many avid readers, and I wish I read as much as they do. But to my surprise, very few of them read with a dictionary on hand. When I ask why, the answer is some variation on “It ruins the mood” or “I want to relax, not study” or the most self-deluded one: “I can figure out most words from the context.”

As for that last one, I can only say that I myself have guessed wrong on a word’s meaning too often to count, and many times if I had gone with what I guessed and not bothered to look it up, I’d have gravely misunderstood some of the author’s fundamental premises — yes, the stakes are that high.

I can illustrate this with a simple example: “Joe inferred that the judge was disinterested.” There are many smart people who would take that sentence to mean, “Joe insinuated that the judge didn’t care.” Boy, would they be wrong.

The sentence actually means, “Joe decided that the judge was unbiased.” Huge difference there. Would you rather have a judge who’s fair or one who wants to go home? “Disinterested” means “impartial.” It does not mean “apathetic” — that would be an uninterested judge.

And because so many people mistakenly think infer is a synonym for imply, a reader might see “inferred” and think Joe was hinting at something, when in fact he had reached a conclusion.

If just a simple seven-word sentence can cause such a misunderstanding, imagine tackling difficult authors like Lawrence Durrell or William Faulkner. Without a dictionary nearby, what you get out of these writers’ books might be a far cry from what they actually wrote.

So here are a few words that may not mean what you think they mean. Misinterpreting a key word can distort the meaning of a sentence and set off a chain reaction of misunderstanding that leaves the reader with a message the author never dreamed of sending.

Livid  When someone is “livid,” do you think of red, white, or blue? The best answer is blue, not red. “Livid” does not mean “red-faced with anger.” The Latin lividus means “of a bluish color.” Second-best answer is white: “livid” can be a synonym for “pale.”

Benighted  “He was a benighted soul in an enlightened time.” Many people associate it with “knighted,” and think “benighted” is a good thing to be. Far from it. Note the lack of a k — don’t think “knight,” think “night.” A benighted soul is clueless, ignorant, “in a state of moral or intellectual darkness.”

Scarify  is a benighted synonym for “terrify” — scarify has more to do with scar than scare. It means to scratch or make superficial incisions. It also has agricultural applications having to do with seeds and soil.

Meretricious  When you hear it, the first two syllables echo “merit,” and the word resembles meritorious. The similarity ends there. It means “flashy,” “cheap,” “tawdry”: “The candidate made a meretricious display of piety.”

(This tip was contributed by veteran copy editor Tom Stern.)

If the article or the existing discussions do not address a thought or question you have on the subject, please use the "Comment" box at the bottom of this page.

4 responses to “That’s what that means?”

  1. Mike P. says:

    I am wondering about the statement, “As for that last one, I can only say that I myself have guessed WRONG on a word’s meaning …”

    Shouldn’t WRONG be WRONGLY? The dictionary states that wrong is an adjective, but in this sentence wrong is referring to guessed which is a verb. Hence, I believe an adverb should be used, making wrongly the appropriate choice.

    • Our guest author, Tom Stern, responds that the 2006 American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language recognizes that the word wrong can serve as either an adjective or an adverb.

  2. John says:

    As for that last one, I can only say that I myself have guessed wrong …

    I myself.

    How many professional writers still fall for redundancies? I myself don’t. ;-)

  3. Julia says:

    Being an avid reader, and having read both with and without a dictionary on hand, the reasons I have for selecting my technique are not listed. Reading with a dictionary on hand is cumbersome. It is practicably impossible if one is reading in bed with someone else in the bed with you. As a matter of fact, reading anywhere with a dictionary, in addition to your book, involves a fair amount of picking up and putting down books, an exercise that often calls for strong wrists and fingers. Forget about if you have arthritis!

    Besides the physical aspect, reading with a dictionary is much slower than reading without. You are right, when we readers do not consult a dictionary, we have to guess the meaning of some words and we are sometimes wrong. When we say, “I’ll figure out the meaning from context,” what we really mean is something along the lines of, “What we figure out from context will have to suffice, since it is not realistic to look up every new word.” When I was in seminary, I used a dictionary when reading theological tests for class. However, I do not use a dictionary when reading a mystery novel in bed with my husband asleep beside me.

Leave a Comment or Question:

Please ensure that your question or comment relates to the topic of the blog post. Unrelated comments may be deleted. If necessary, use the "Search" box on the right side of the page to find a post closely related to your question or comment.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *