What better way to begin a Media Watch column than with headlines? Here are two recent ones that got our attention:
• “Bacteria has sickened more than 100.”
• “Foreclosure crisis makes taught thriller.”
“Bacteria has sickened” is incorrect because has is singular and bacteria is the plural of bacterium. If the headline writer balked at “bacteria have sickened” or “bacterium has sickened,” we can sympathize, sort of—but why not instead write “Germ has sickened more than 100”?
As for that second headline, who confuses taught with taut? This looks like the work of a distracted multitasker.
• “Hundreds packed the stands, looking for a chance to relish in a sense of community.”
You can revel in a sense of community, or you can relish a sense of community, but “relish in” is nonsense.
• “A completely new species of rat was discovered.”
This sentence gives adverbs a bad name. What does “completely” add, except flab?
• “He was forbidden from giving his name.”
Handy rule: Use to, not from, with forbid: “He was forbidden to give his name.”
• “The CEO receives nearly 2,000 times the compensation as an employee.”
Where did “as an employee” come from? It doesn’t fit. Did a prankster sneak in and write it? Make it “The CEO receives nearly 2,000 times the compensation that an employee receives.”
• “Her rivals tried to emulate her.”
Delete “tried to” and make it “Her rivals emulated her.” One does not “try to emulate.” To emulate means “to try to be as good or successful as.” So when we emulate, we’re already trying. The original sentence is gibberish: Her rivals tried to try to be as good as she was.
• “Stainless steel appliances await whomever inhabits the chef’s kitchen next.”
The whomever is incorrect. The writer would argue that whomever was required as the object of “await.” But then the verb “inhabits” would have no subject, because whomever is always an object. You can’t have a verb without a subject, and objects can’t also be subjects, so it has to be “Stainless steel appliances await whoever inhabits the chef’s kitchen next.”
• “He was clutching the leash of his dog, who was also shot.”
• “This is about political influence by a public utility who spends a lot of money in Sacramento.”
The pronoun who applies only to humans. The writer of the first sentence balked at using “which” for the dog. The writer of the second sentence decided that corporations are people. They’re not, at least not grammatically. The fix is easy: “a public utility that spends a lot of money in Sacramento.”
The following are sentences recently heard over the airwaves. See if you can make them better. Answers are at the bottom of the newsletter.
1. “Neither her mother or the police believed his denial.”
2. “He is one of the men they can most afford not to lose.”
3. “I see you nodding your head no.”
4. “A cable from he himself established that.”
5. “I am one of many people that are trying to advance the art form.”
Pop Quiz Answers
1. “Neither her mother nor the police believed his denial.”
2. “He is one of the men they can least afford to lose.”
3. “I see you shaking your head no.”
4. “A cable from him himself established that.” (Correct grammar isn’t always pretty.)
5. “I am one of many people that are trying to advance the art form.” CORRECT
Posted on Tuesday, November 3, 2015, at 10:51 pm
If you wish to respond to another reader's question or comment, please click its corresponding "REPLY" button. If the article or the existing discussions do not address a thought or question you have on the subject, please use the "Comment" box at the bottom of this page.13 Comments on Media Watch